02.11.2026 · MondayRESISTANCE MEDIA · independent mediasprotyv.team ↗
Support
Tag · evidence base

#petition

4cases
First case
18.09.2025
Latest case
19.05.2026
CASE No. 2706 · latest with this tag
Politics, 19.05.2026
SectionPoliticsDate19.05.2026Reading1 min

Ukrainians backed the petition against bail for top corrupt officials

RESISTANCE has collected the required number of signatures for the petition to abolish bail for top corrupt officials.

Open the case
February 20262 cases
№00226.02.202626.022026Verkhovna Rada committee responds to RESISTANCE petition on directing 100% of the military levy to the armyThe Verkhovna Rada Committee on Finance, Tax and Customs Policy has considered the RESISTANCE petition on directing 100% of the military levy straight to the needs of the army and has given an official reply. Although the petition did not collect the required number of signatures because of the platform's problematic functionality and the lack of an option to sign via Bank ID, it was recognised as important and considered in the established procedure.Corruption1 min · case No. 2593
№00325.02.202625.022026Anti-Corruption Policy Committee meeting on the Midas case: what to expect?On 26 February the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Anti-Corruption Policy will hold a special meeting on the investigation of the Midas case. It will hear representatives of NABU, SAPO, the SBU and Deputy Minister of Justice of Ukraine Yevhen Pikalov. What will this achieve? Will the Committee be able to counter pressure on the investigation and outline the next steps for law enforcement? I think rather not than yes. The Office of the President has direct influence over parliament, and the format itself does not define any specific legal decisions.Investigations1 min · case No. 2589
September 20251 case
№00418.09.202518.092025Pack your bags: why Yermak should be dismissed as head of the Presidential OfficeReason 1: The «Yermak tapes» - a corruption scandal around Andriy Yermak's brother, who was «trading in government posts»Top story3 min · case No. 2354