02.11.2026 · MondayRESISTANCE MEDIA · independent mediasprotyv.team ↗
Support
CASE No. 2689SectionCorruptionDateReading time1 minInvestigator / authorRESISTANCE editorial team

SBU officers caught taking a $110,000 bribe

The case in briefRESISTANCE MEDIA

At a time when society expects justice from law enforcement, a story is unfolding in Poltava that looks less like an isolated case of corruption and more like a demonstration of how easily the process itself can be turned into a bargaining tool. According to NABU and SAPO, SBU officers and a lawyer have been served notices of suspicion for extorting 110,000 US dollars from a businessman. The suspects are Oleksandr Popp, head of the investigative department of the SBU in Poltava region, and his subordinate, senior investigator Serhiy Herashchenko, who acted through a lawyer and demanded money to "settle the matter", which in effect meant ending a criminal prosecution in a case concerning the possible supply of equipment to Russia through intermediary companies in Kazakhstan.

SBU officers caught taking a $110,000 bribe
Corruption, 06.05.2026

The story begins with the arrest, when anti-corruption bodies caught the suspects red-handed while they were receiving the second part of the bribe - 55,000 dollars - and that moment became the key evidence in the case.
According to local media, the businessman is Ihor Lebedyk, owner of the Poltava Diamond Tool Plant, who became the "victim" in this story. He was found guilty, but avoided actual imprisonment thanks to a plea deal and a donation to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This is where the story stops being just news about a bribe, because it shows how easily criminal proceedings can turn into a "service", where the outcome depends not on evidence and the court but on the amount someone is willing to pay.

Svitlana Myrna, head of the RESISTANCE branch in Poltava region, comments on the situation:
"This case shows not just corruption but the de facto privatisation of the criminal process. When procedural powers become a bargaining tool, justice loses its very essence. The paradox is that pressure is often put on convenient targets - activists, for example, where there are no bribes at all. But the main thing in stories like this is not to end up exposing yourself, and this time it somehow didn't work out."

RESISTANCE will closely follow the course of this investigation.
Silence is consent. RESISTANCE is action. Join us.

Form No. 1 · reader actionsprotyv.media

Don't stay silent:
share the case

Share the case
Tell the editorsHave documents or facts? support@sprotyv.team ↗
→Next casesAll: Corruption